Contemporary Architecture Making Up For A Harsh Environment



Contemporary Architecture Making Up For A Harsh Environment

EDDI’s House was named after the nickname of one of the architects and is said to be located in a very harsh environment. This is why this project is not about connecting the home with its exterior, but rather emphasizing on the interior. Here is more official information: “The design concept is “Go in to go out,” meaning that the house has an outside patio at the center of the house onto which each and every room looks out. Furthermore, a balcony is placed above and adjacent to the central patio overlooking it such that this combination of open spaces creates an “interface” between the outside proper and the inside that acts a filter, a buffer, or a cushion between the two zones.” The large and spacious interiors all pointing to the inner patio make up for the unfriendly environment, turning this project into an isolated but extremely elegant crib. 

















Contemporary Architecture Making Up For A Harsh Environment Video :




Indonesian architecture










Indonesian architecture


Indonesian architecture reflects the diversity of cultural, historical and geographic influences that have shaped Indonesia as a whole. Invaders, colonisers, missionaries, merchants and traders brought cultural changes that had a profound effect on building styles and techniques. Traditionally, the most significant foreign influence has been Indian. However, Chinese, Arab—and since the 18th and 19th centuries—European influences have been important. Religious architecture The Prambanan temple complex.

 Although religious architecture has been widespread in Indonesia, the most significant was developed in Java. The island's long tradition of religious syncretism extended to architecture, which fostered uniquely Javanese styles of Hindu, Buddhist, Islamic, and to a lesser extent, Christian architecture. A number of often large and sophisticated religious structures (known as candi in Indonesian) were built in Java during the peak of Indonesia's great Hindu-Buddhist kingdoms between the 8th and 14th centuries. The earliest surviving Hindu temples in Java are at the Dieng Plateau. Thought to have originally numbered as many as 400, only 8 remain today.

 The Dieng structures were small and relatively plain, but architecture developed substantially and just 100 years later the second Kingdom of Mataram built the Prambanan complex near Yogyakarta; considered the largest and finest example of Hindu architecture in Java. The World Heritage-listed Buddhist monument Borobudur was built by the Sailendra Dynasty between 750 and 850 AD, but it was abandoned shortly after its completion as a result of the decline of Buddhism and a shift of power to eastern Java. The monument contains a vast number of intricate carvings that tell a story as one moves through to the upper levels, metaphorically reaching enlightenment. With the decline of the Mataram Kingdom, eastern Java became the focus of religious architecture with an exuberant style reflecting Shaivist, Buddhist and Javanese influences; a fusion that was characteristic of religion throughout Java. 

 "Grand Mosque" of Yogyakarta shows javanese interpretation and took Hindu heritage of Meru stepped roofs.Although brick was used to some extent during Indonesia's classical era, it was the Majapahit builders who mastered it, using a mortar of vine sap and palm sugar. The temples of Majaphit have a strong geometrical quality with a sense of verticality achieved through the use of numerous horizontal lines often with an almost art-deco sense of streamlining and proportion. Majapahit influencess can be seen today in the enormous number of Hindu temples of varying sizes spread throughout Bali . Several significant temples can be found in every village, and shrines, even small temples found in most family homes. Although they have elements in common with global Hindu styles, they are of a style largely unique to Bali and owe much to the Majapahit era. 

 By the fifteenth century, Islam had become the dominant religion in Java and Sumatra, Indonesia's two most populous islands. As with Hinduism and Buddhism before it, the new religion, and the foreign influences that accompanied it, were absorbed and reinterpreted, with mosques given a unique Indonesian/Javanese interpretation. At the time, Javanese mosques took many design cues from Hindu, Buddhist, and even Chinese architectural influences (see image of "Grand Mosque" in Yogyakarta). They lacked, for example, the ubiquitous Islamic dome which did not appear in Indonesia until the 19th century, but had tall timber, multi-level roofs not that dissimilar to the pagodas of Balinese Hindu temples still common today. 

A number of significant early mosques survive, particularly along the north coast of Java. These include the Mesjid Agung in Demak, built in 1474, and the Al-Manar Mosque in Kudus (1549) whose menara ("minaret") is thought to be the watch tower of an earlier Hindu temple. Particularly during the decades since Indonesian independence, mosques have tended to be built in styles more consistent with global Islamic styles, which mirrors the trend in Indonesia towards more orthodox practice of Islam. Traditional vernacular architecture An avenue of houses in a Torajan village. Rumah adat are the distinctive style of traditional housing unique to each ethnic group in Indonesia. Despite this the diversity of styles, built by peoples with a common Austronesian ancestry, traditional homes of Indonesia share a number of characteristics such as timber construction, varied and elaborate roof structures, and pile and beam construction that take the load straight to the ground. 

These houses are at the centre of a web of customs, social relations, traditional laws, taboos, myths and religions that bind the villagers together. The house provides the main focus for the family and its community, and is the point of departure for many activities of its residents. Traditional Indonesian homes are not architect designed, rather villagers build their own homes, or a community will pool their resources for a structure built under the direction of a master builder and/or a carpenter. Traditional house in Nias; its post, beam and lintel construction with flexible nail-less joints, and non-load bearing walls are typical of rumah adat. The norm is for a post, beam and lintel structural system with either wooden or bamboo walls that are non-load bearing. Traditionally, rather than nails, mortis and tenon joints and wooden pegs are used. Natural materials - timber, bamboo, thatch and fibre - make up rumah adat. Hardwood is generally used for piles and a combination of soft and hard wood is used for the house's upper non-load bearing walls, and are often made of lighter wood or thatch. The thatch material can be coconut and sugar palm leaves, alang alang grass and rice straw.

 Traditional dwellings have developed to respond to natural environmental conditions, particularly Indonesia's hot and wet monsoonal climate. As is common throughout South East Asia and the South West Pacific, Indonesian traditional vernacular homes are built on stilts (with the notable exceptions of Java and Bali). A raised floor serves a number of purposes: it allows breeze to moderate the hot tropical temperatures; it elevates the dwelling above stormwater runoff and mud; allows houses to be built on rivers and wetland margins; keeps people, goods and food from dampness and moisture; lifts living quarters above malaria-carrying mosquitos; and the house is much less affected by dry rot and termites. A traditional Batak house in North Sumatra. A fishing village of pile houses in the Riau archipelago. Many forms of rumah adat have walls that are dwarfed in size by large roof—often of saddle shape—which are supported independently by sturdy piles. 

Over all traditional styles, sharply inclined allowing tropical rain downpours to quickly sheet off, and large overhanging eaves keep water out of the house and provide shade in the heat. The houses of the Batak people in Sumatra and the Toraja people in Sulawesi (tongkonan houses) are noted for their stilted boat-shapes with great upsweeping ridge ends. In hot and humid low-lying coastal regions, homes can have many windows providing good cross-ventilation, whereas in cooler mountainous interior areas, homes often have a vast roof and few windows. Some of the more significant and distinctive rumah adat include: 

 * Batak architecture (North Sumatra) includes the boat-shaped jabu homes of the Toba Batak people, with dominating carved gables and dramatic oversized roof, and are based on an ancient Dong-Son model. 
* The Minangkabau of West Sumatra build the rumah gadang, distinctive for their multiple gables with dramatically upsweeping ridge ends. 
* The homes of Nias peoples include the omo sebua chiefs' houses built on massive ironwood pillars with towering roofs. Not only are they almost impregnable to attack in former tribal warfare, but flexible nail-less construction provide proven earthquake durability. 
* The Riau region is characterised by villages built on stilts over waterways. 
* Unlike most South East Asian vernacular homes, Javanese rumah adat are not built on piles, and have become the Indonesian vernacular style most influenced by European architectural elements. 
* The Bubungan Tinggi, with their steeply pitched roofs, are the large homes of Banjarese royalty and aristocrats in South Kalimantan. 
* Traditional Balinese homes are a collection of individual, largely open structures (including separate structures for the kitchen, sleeping areas, bathing areas and shrine) within a high-walled garden compound. 
* The Sasak people of Lombok build lumbung, pile-built bonnet-roofed rice barns, that are often more distinctive and elaborate than their houses. 
* Dayak people traditionally live in communal longhouses that are built on piles. The houses can exceed 300 m in length, in some cases forming a whole village. 
* The Toraja of the Sulawesi highlands are renowned for their tongkonan, houses built on piles and dwarfed by massive exaggerated-pitch saddle roofs. 
* Rumah adat on Sumba have distinctive thatched "high hat" roofs and are wrapped with sheltered verandahs. 
* The Dani of Papua live in small family compounds composed of several circular huts known as honay with thatched dome roofs. 

 Palace architecture 

Sultan palace in Yogyakarta. Istana (or "palace") architecture of the various kingdoms and realms of Indonesia, is more often than not based on the vernacular adat domestic styles of the area. Royal courts, however, were able to develop much grander and elaborate versions of this traditional architecture. In the Javanese Kraton, for example, large penodopos of the joglo roof form with tumpang sari ornamentation are elaborate but based on common Javanese forms, while the omo sebua ("chief's house") in Bawomataluo, Nias is an enlarged version of the homes in the village, the palaces of the Balinese such as the Puri Agung in Gianyar use the traditional bale form, and the Pagaruyung Palace is a 3-storey version of the Minangkabau Rumah Gadang.

 Similar to trends in domestic architecture, the last two centuries have seen the use of European elements in combination with traditional elements, albeit at a far more sophisticated and opulent level compared to domestic homes. In the Javanese palaces the pendopo is the tallest and largest hall within a complex. As the place where the ruler sits, it is the focus of ceremonial occasions, and usually has prohibitions on access to this space. 

 Colonial architecture 

Javanese and neo-classical Indo-European hybrid villa. Note the Javanese roof form and general similarities with the Javanese cottage (pictured in gallery). The 16th and 17th centuries saw the arrival of European powers in Indonesia who used masonry for much of their construction. Previously timber and its by-products had been almost exclusively used in Indonesia, with the exception of some major religious and palace architecture. One of the first major Dutch settlements was Batavia (later Jakarta) which in the 17th and 18th centuries was a fortified brick and masonry city. For almost two centuries, the colonialists did little to adapt their European architectural habits to the tropical climate. In Batavia, for example, they constructed canals through its low-lying terrain, which were fronted by small-windowed and poorly ventilated row houses, mostly in a Chinese-Dutch hybrid style. The canals became dumping grounds for noxious waste and sewage and an ideal breeding ground for the anopheles mosquitos, with malaria and dysentery becoming rife throughout the Dutch East Indies colonial capital. Ceremonial Hall, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, by architect Henri Maclaine-Pont Although row houses, canals and enclosed solid walls were first thought as protection against tropical diseases coming from tropical air, years later the Dutch learnt to adapt their architectural style with local building features (long eaves, verandahs, porticos, large windows and ventilation openings).

The Indo-European hybrid villas of the 19th century would be among the first colonial buildings to incorporate Indonesian architectural elements and attempt adapting to the climate. The basic form, such as the longitudinal organisation of spaces and use of joglo and limasan roof structures, was Javanese, but it incorporated European decorative elements such as neo-classical columns around deep verandahs. Whereas the Indo-European homes were essentially Indonesian houses with European trim, by the early 20th century, the trend was for modernist influences—such as art-deco—being expressed in essentially European buildings with Indonesian trim (such as the pictured home's high-pitched roofs with Javan ridge details). Practical measures carried over from the earlier Indo-European hybrids, which responded to the Indonesian climate, included overhanging eaves, larger windows and ventilation in the walls. This pre-war Bandung home is an example of 20th century Indonesian Dutch Colonial styles 

 .At the end of the 19th century, great changes were happening across much of colonial Indonesia, particularly Java. Significant improvements to technology, communications and transportation had brought new wealth to Java's cities and private enterprise was reaching the countryside.[2] Modernistic buildings required for such development appeared in great numbers, and were heavily influenced by international styles. These new buildings included train stations, business hotels, factories and office blocks, hospitals and education institutions. The largest stock of colonial era buildings are in the large cities of Java, such as Bandung, Jakarta, Semarang, and Surabaya. 

Bandung is of particular note with one of the largest remaining collections of 1920s Art-Deco buildings in the world,[3] with the notable work of several Dutch architects and planners, including Albert Aalbers, Thomas Karsten, Henri Maclaine-Pont, J Gerber and C.P.W. Schoemaker. Colonial rule was never as extensive on the island of Bali as it was on Java— it was only in 1906, for example, that the Dutch gained full control of the island—and consequently the island only has a limited stock of colonial architecture. Singaraja, the island's former colonial capital and port, has a number of art-deco kantor style homes, tree-lined streets and dilapidated warehouses. 

The hill town of Munduk, a town amongst plantations established by the Dutch, is Bali's only other significant group of colonial architecture; a number of mini mansions in the Balinese-Dutch style still survive. The lack of development due to the Great Depression, the turmoil of the Second World War and Indonesia's independence struggle of the 1940s, and economic stagnation during the politically turbulent 1950s and 60s, meant that much colonial architecture has been preserved through to recent decades. Although colonial homes were almost always the preserve of the wealthy Dutch, Indonesian and Chinese elites, and colonial buildings in general are unavoidably linked with the human suffering of colonialism, the styles were often rich and creative combinations of two cultures, so much so that the homes remain sought after into 21st century. Native architecture was arguably more influenced by the new European ideas than colonial architecture was influenced by Indonesian styles; and these Western elements continue to be a dominant influence on Indonesia's built environment today.

  Post independence architecture 

National Monument (Monas) at Merdeka square,Jakarta. Early twentieth century modernisms are still very evident across much of Indonesia, again mostly in Java. The 1930s world depression was devastating to Java, and was followed by another decade of war, revolution and struggle, which restricted the development of the built environment. Further, the Javanese art-deco style from the 1920s became the root for the first Indonesian national style in the 1950s. The politically turbulent 1950s meant that the new but bruised Indonesia was neither able to afford or focussed to follow the new international movements such as modernist brutalism. Continuity from the 1920s and 30s through to the 1950s was further supported Indonesian planners who had been colleagues of the Dutch Karsten, and they continued many of his principles.
  "Let us prove that we can also build the country like the Europeans and Americans do because we are equal" — Sukarno Istiqlal Mosque, the national mosque of Indonesia.

 Despite the new country's economic woes, government-funded major projects were undertaken in the modernist style, particularly in the capital Jakarta. Reflecting President Sukarno's political views, the architecture is openly nationalistic and strives to show the new nation’s pride in itself. Projects approved by Sukarno, himself a civil engineer who had acted as an architect, include: * A clover-leaf highway. * A broad by-pass in Jakarta (Jalan Sudirman). * Four high-rise hotels including the famous Hotel Indonesia. * A new parliament building. * The 127 000-seat Bung Karno Stadium. * Numerous monuments including The National Monument. * Istiqlal Mosque the largest mosque in Southeast Asia. The 1970s, 1980s and 1990s saw foreign investment and economic growth; large construction booms brought major changes to Indonesian cities, including the replacement of the early twentieth styles with late modern and postmodern styles.


Redefining Batik in Modern House



Redefining Batik in Modern House
 
Memilih batik sebagai satu titik awal menghadirkan desain hunian dengan tampilan elegan ternyata juga memberikan pengalaman rasa yang berujung pada kualitas ekspresif di dalamnya. Arsitek Rudy Kelana dari Wahana Architects selalu merasa perlu untuk memiliki dialog yang baik dengan klien tentang seperti apa kehidupan mereka. “Tidak pernah cukup hanya mendengarkan kebutuhan-kebutuhan pemilik rumah, tetapi perlu juga datang dan melihat seperti apa mereka di rumah mereka terdahulu,” jelas Rudy.


Bagi arsitek, bentuk lahan yang tidak beraturan seluas 427 m2 di depan taman lingkungan ini menjadi tantangan menarik. Dua massa utama dihubungkan oleh satu massa penghubung; mewadahi kamar tidur utama yang berkesan mengambang, taman di bawahnya, area kolam renang, dan teras yang mengaburkan ruang luar dan dalam. Area lahan sisa yang menjorok keluar dan sempit kemudian dimanfaatkan sebagai tangga dan menjadi galeri untuk koleksi lukisan dan benda antik lainnya.


“Pada dasarnya pemilik rumah memiliki gaya hidup yang santai, sangat menyukai kayu, bahkan memiliki koleksi furnitur antik yang cukup banyak. Batik kemudian dipilih menjadi cara untuk bisa menyatukan semuanya tanpa kehilangan esensi elegan secara visual,” papar Rudy Kelana. Kehadiran pola batik pada beberapa dinding massa bangunan dan juga interior dipadukan dengan jendela jalusi yang berkesan sangat lokal mengikuti konsep kombinasi warna kayu dan abu-abu beton yang kemudian diperkaya dengan lantai marmer Malaka Grey.

“Rumah ini adalah modernitas yang dibungkus oleh batik. Tatanan ruang
di dalamnya tidak formal dengan akses utama menggunakan ram menuju ke dalam rumah tanpa harus ada simbol atau fisik pintu utama. Di sini pola ruang yang serba terbuka dan modern mewadahi gaya hidup yang santai dan tetap tampil elegan dengan ekspresi batik pada berbagai bagiannya.”

Motif batik memang merepresentasikan kebudayaan jawa, Tetapi sentuhan modern dari tatanan ruang yang serba terbuka sangat sesuai dengan gaya hidup pemilik rumah yang santai. Di ruang foyer menuju ruang duduk terdapat sekat-sekat yang bisa digeser untuk membuat proporsi ruang menjadi nyaman sesuai dengan kegiatan. Hunian ini diakses melalui ramp panjang di antara dua masa ke lantai dua yang mewadahi ruang komunal seperti ruang makan, ruang keluarga, teras dan juga ada perpustakaan yang dirancang transparan. Sementara, kamar tidur anak terletak di lantai tiga.


Dengan tetap memanfaatkan kayu dari bongkaran rumah terdahulu, hunian ini seakan tidak memiliki pintu utama dan diwujudkan dari tatanan ruang yang memungkinkan penghawaan dan pencahayaan alami bisa hadir dengan baik. Sebuah hunian di iklim tropis yang sarat unsur budaya dan semua dihadirkan dengan elegan.


General Info :

Site area : 427 m2
House : 947 m2
Principal Architect : Rudy Kelana, Gerard Tambunan, Sofia Purba
Architect Firm : Wahana Architects
Contractor : Wahana Cipta Selaras & Neron Construction
Lighting : Infiniti lighting
Landscape : Sanggar Kemuning
Interior : Platform Architects
Structure : Ricky Theo
Wall paint indoor and outdoor : Mowilex
Wood paint : Propan
AC Unit : Daikin
Main floor : Malaka Grey






Mengintip 7 Hasil Karya Terbaik Dari Arsitek Indonesia

Mengintip 7 Hasil Karya Terbaik Dari Arsitek Indonesia

1.. Menara Phinisi UNM – Yu Sing



Yu Sing adalah arsitek Indonesia asal kota Bandung yang terkenal akan kemampuannya bermain dengan material-material daur ulang yang berani dan juga konsep bangunan dan rumah ramah lingkungan. Salah satu karya megah dan terbaik dari arsitek Indonesia satu ini adalah Menara Phinisi UNM. Melalui karya Yu Sing satu ini, kamu bisa melihat gaya kontemporer yang memang selalu identik dengan rancangan-rancangan yang ia buat.

2. Masjid Istiqlal – Fredrich Silaban

Museum Tsunami adalah salah satu karya arsitek Indonesia terbaik selanjutnya. Digagas sebagai monumen simbolis bencana Tsunami pada 2004, bangunan megah karya arsitek Indonesia, Ridwan Kamil ini kaya akan unsur filosofi yang dalam dan merepresentasi keadaan, situasi, dan rasa saat bencana Tsunami terjadi.

Selain museum Tsunami, karya Ridwan Kamil lainnya yang tak kalah populer adalah Rumah Botol,


Fredrich Silaban adalah salah satu arsitek Indonesia pada era kemerdekaan yang dikagumi tak hanya oleh sesama arsitek Indonesia, namun juga oleh arsitek dunia. Dari sekian banyak karyanya, salah satu yang terkenal dan masih berdiri megah hingga saat ini adalah Masjid Istiqlal.

Karya Fredrich Silaban ini merupakan hasil memenangkan sayembara yang dibuat oleh Bung Karno. Masjid karya arsitek Indonesia satu ini bahkan sempat menjadi masjid terbesar di Asia Tenggara pada era 1970-an.

3. Museum Tsunami Aceh – Ridwan Kamil


Museum Tsunami adalah salah satu karya arsitek Indonesia terbaik selanjutnya. Digagas sebagai monumen simbolis bencana Tsunami pada 2004, bangunan megah karya arsitek Indonesia, Ridwan Kamil ini kaya akan unsur filosofi yang dalam dan merepresentasi keadaan, situasi, dan rasa saat bencana Tsunami terjadi.

Selain museum Tsunami, karya Ridwan Kamil lainnya yang tak kalah populer adalah Rumah Botol, Masjid Merapi, dan juga Masjid Al-Irsyad.

4. Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia – Budiman Hendropurnomo


Karya terbaik arsitek Indonesia selanjutnya adalah perpustakaan Univeritas Indonesia karya arsitek Indonesia, Budiman Hendropurnomo. Memiliki konsep dan kesan yang mendekati alam, rancangan perpurstakaan karya arsitek Indonesia ini juga memberikan ruang luar yang mampu difungsikan sebagai ruang santai publik yang bisa digunakan masyarakat sekitar.

Ruang-ruang dinamis yang berada di dalam gedung perpustakaan ini membuat bagunan megah karya arsitek Indonesia ini makin mengagumkan.

5. Alor Island Airport / Mali Airport – Nataneka


Alor Island Airport atau dikenal juga dengan nama Mali Airport adalah bangunan karya arsitek Indonesia, Nataneka Architects. Memiliki gubahan masa yang menarik dan unik, menjadikan konsep desain karya arsitek Indonesia, Nataneka memenangkan sayembara untuk pembangunan lapangan udara di Nusa Tenggara Timur ini.

Saking mengagumkannya, karya arsitek Indonesia ini sempat dipamerkan bersama karya arsitek Indonesia lainnya pada pameran arsitektur internasional di Korea Selatan.

6. KCN Office – Atelier Cosmas Gozali


Melihat dari bentuknya saja kamu akan merasa jika bangunan ini layak disebut sebagai karya terbaik. Memiliki bentuk khas arsitektur modern dibanding lingkungan sekitarnya, bangunan ini berhasil tampil standout dan megah.

Lebih membanggakan lagi, bangunan ini dirancang oleh arsitek Indonesia, Cosmas Gozali.  Cosmas Gozali sendiri merupakan arsitek Indonesia yang masih aktif di dunia arsitektur dan dekat dengan dunia seni yang bisa kamu lihat dari keunikan karya-karya arsitek Indonesia satu ini.


7. Konservasi Mbaru Niang (Rumah Adat Suku Wae Rebo) – Yori Antar


Jika arsitek Indonesia sebelumnya terkenal akan karya bangunan modern, Yori Antar putra dari tokoh arsitektur Indonesia, Han Awal, justru tengah dikagumi akan proyek-proyek konservasi arsitektur vernakural Indonesia yang ia jalani.

Salah satu proyek arsitek Indonesia satu ini yang terkenal dan dikagumi adalah konservasi “Mbaru Niang”. Selain itu, ia juga aktif mengembangkan berbagai rumah adat dan arsitektur tradisional Indonesia lainnya yang sudah terancam punah jika tak dilestarikan.

Itulah beberapa nama besar dalam dunia arsitektur Indonesia.








Le Corbusier

Perkotaan"
Le CORBUSIER

Charles-Edouard Jeanneret, yang dikenal dengan sebutan Le Corbusier (October 6, 1887 – August 27, 1965), adalah seorang arsitek dan penulis kelahiran Perancis-Swiss, yang sangat terkenal karena kontribusinya pada modernisme atau international-style. Pemikirannya dipengaruhi oleh apa saja yang ia lihat, terutama kota-kota industri di pergantian abad. Le Corbusier tertarik pada visual art dan menempuh pendidikannya di La-Chaux-de-Fonds Art School. Guru Arsitekturnya pada masa itu adalah arsitek René Chapallaz, yang kemudian menjadi pengaruh terbesar pada desain beliau pada awal karirnya.


Selama Perang Dunia I, Le Corbusier mengajar di sekolah lamanya La-Chaux-de-Fonds Art School, dan tidak kembali ke Paris sampai perang tersebut berakhir. Selama 4 tahun di Swiss, Le Corbusier menelaah banyak teori-teori arsitektur yang menggunakan kaidah teknik arsitektur modern. Salah satu karya Le Corbusier pada masa itu adalah “Domino House” (1914-1915).
"Domino Hause" menjadi konsep bangunan bertingkat yang banyak di gunakan hingga sekarang
Desain tersebut kemudian menjadi dasar dari sebagian besar karya beliau sampai 10 tahun setelahnya, di mana kemudian beliau memulai mendesain karya-karyanya bersama keponakannya, Pierre Jeanneret (1896-1967) sampai tahun 1940. Pada tahun 1918, Le Corbusier bertemu dengan Amédée Ozenfant, seorang pelukis Cubist. Ozenfant mendukungnya untuk melukis, di mana kemudian periode hubungan kerjasama mereka pun dimulai. Dengan menganggap Cubism sebagai sesautu yang irrasional namun “romantis”, mereka kemudian mempublikasikan manifesto mereka, Après le Cubisme dan menetapkan teori pergerakan arsitektur modern yang baru, Purism. Purism Purism adalah suatu bentuk dari Cubism, yang merupakan salah satu pendekatan estetika dalam arsitektur. Le Corbusier dan Ozenfant pertama kali mendeskripsikan prinsip-prinsip dasar teori ini pada tahun 1918. Ekspresi dari Purism adalah ekspresi yang menampilkan kemurnian bangunan yang sepi ornamen, sejalan dengan adagium arsitektur modern yang menilai bahwa: "Ornament is a crime", teori ini muncul karena adanya keinginan untuk melepaskan diri dari penggunaan ornamen dengan berprinsip bahwa tanpa ornamen bangunan bisa tampak lebih indah.
Bangunan rangcangan Le Corbusier, Walau putih dan tanpa ornament tetapi tetap indah
Bermula dari kegagalan Pemerintah Perancis dalam menangani masalah slum area(permukiman kumuh) dan krisis perumahan perkotaan, kemudian beliu terjun ke dalam urban planning(perencanaan perkotaan). Le Corbusier menemukan solusi untuk masalah permukiman kumuh dan krisis perumahan perkotaan. Dengan Architectural Modern, dia yakin dapat memberikan solusi dalam menaikkan kualitas hidup untuk orang kelas bawah.
Solusinya adalah membuat suatu hunian yang cukup untuk banyak orang. Pada tahun 1922, rencana hunian tersebut terealisasikan dengan nama IMMEUBLES VILLAS (1922) suatu hunian yang ia menyebutnya sebagai –Blocks of Cell- seperti individual apartements, suatu bangunan yang memiliki beberapa lantai. Setiap ruangan terdapat R. tamu, R. tidur, dapur, dan taman..
Immeubles Villas tahun1922, menjadi bangunan bertingkat yang mampu menampung banyak masyarakat, seperti apartemen dan rumah susun saat ini.

Selain itu munculnya hasil rancangan Le Corbusier yang bernama CONTEMPORARY CITY(1922) yang dapat menampung 3 juta penduduk. Menunjukkan bahwa dia tidak hanya berkecimpung pada design-design rumah akan tetapi beliau juga mulai untuk men-design kawasan kota.

Contemporery City tahun 1922, dapat menampung 3 juta penduduk sehingga dapat menjadi salah satu solusi krisis permukiman diperkotaan (Prncis) saat itu.
salah satu permukiman saat ini yang mirip dengan Contemporery City

Penambah jalan bebas hambatan (freeways) pada contemporary city, membuat rancangan ini menjadi suatu hunian baru yang low cost, low density, highly profitable, dan bebas dari pertumbuhan permukiman-permukiman kecil yang berpotensi semrawut dan mengurangi mobilitas. Hal ini membuat le Corbusier terkenal dengan sebagai salah satu orang pertama yang menyadari pengaruh mobilitas terhadap bentuk dan rancangan pemukiman manusia. Ia tidak menyukai segala bentuk hiasan atau ornamentasi pada bangunan, dan pernah mengatakan bahwa "semua bangunan seharusnya berwarna putih”.
lagi, Villa Savoye, Poissy-sur-Seine, Perancis bangunan karya Le Corbusier yang berwarna putih sesuai dengan ciri khas le Corbusier yang menyatakan semua bangunan seharusnya berwarna putih
Pada tahun 1930an Le Corbusier kembali mereformulasi idenya tentang perkotaan, kali ini dengan rancangan La Ville Radieuse (The Radiant City). Perbedaan mendasar dengan Contemporery City adalah mengabaikan kelas berdasarkan stratifikasi pemilik lama, namun lebih kepada besarnya keluarga, bukan pada posisi ekonomi. Dengan konsepnya seperti 14m2 untuk 1 orang, Dengan pembangunan secara vertikal, KDB kecil, sehingga area disekitarnya dapat digunakan sebagai taman bermain dan tempat parkir, kemudian dengan adanya tangga penyambung antar blok bangungan.
Radiant City Tahun 1930, dengan konsep memunculkan open space seperti taman dan parkir

Dengan konsep-konsep diatas maka dapat mendukung teori yang dicetuskan oleh le Corbusier yang menyatakan bahwa pusat kota yang besar harus terdiri terutama dari skyscrapers - khusus untuk komersial - dan yang diduduki oleh kawasan ini seharusnya tidak lebih dari 5%. Sisanya 95% harus taman dengan pepohonan.

Rancangan yang sesuai dengan teorinya, dimana didominasi oleh pohon dan tumbuhan
Melihat konsep-konsep yang dikembangkannya pada saat zamannya dan berguna hingga saat ini maka tepatlah julukan yang diberikan kepada sejak dulu yaitu " Leader of modern-better seatlement and better soceity".




Daniel Libeskind’s New Apartment Complex in Milan


Daniel Libeskind’s New Apartment Complex in Milan

In Milan, city officials and development company Assicurazioni Generali are in the midst of transforming Milano Fiera, a 90-acre site first built to host a 1920 trade fair. The location, just west of La Triennale, takes advantage of a rare find: a swath of available land in the historic center of an otherwise dense city. Called City Life, the residential, commercial, and cultural complex is being designed by three different architecture firms: Studio Libeskind, Zaha Hadid Architects, and Arata Isozaki & Associates. City Life will also create a new subway stop for the city’s metro, a system which serves over one million riders each day.

During last month’s Salone Mobile, architect Daniel Libeskind, who conceived the project’s master plan and who moved to the city on a part-time basis to oversee the design, unveiled the residential components his firm created. Situated along City Life’s perimeter, the buildings respond to the scale of their context, ranging from small villas to a 14-story tower. Clad in Italian tile, the structures are contoured with Libeskind’s distinctive angularity. Wood brise-soleils provide shade from the intense Italian sun while softening the appearance of the façades. Collectively, the buildings help frame a central courtyard—a nod to Italy’s architectural history and a big amenity for contemporary life. As Libeskind said in a statement, “While a new lifestyle emerges in Milan, there is a need to connect work and new possibilities of living in a sustainably responsive and environmentally advanced way.”
Cool.


Yori Antar: Membangun Kembali Kekayaan Arsitektur Nusantara


Yori Antar: Membangun Kembali Kekayaan Arsitektur Nusantara
Yori Antar adalah seorang arsitek yang sangat gigih menggali ilmu arsitektur lokal, mendokumentasikan, dan membangun kembali arsitektur nusantara berupa rumah-rumah adat yang terancam punah di wilayah pedesaan negeri ini.

Yori Antar begitu prihatin melihat gejala bahwa arsitektur tradisional di negeri ini terancam punah dan terlupakan di antara megahnya bangunan modern. Hal itu diperparah dengan tidak adanya dokumentasi catatan atau buku yang autentik mengenai ilmu merancang rumah-rumah adat tersebut. Padahal bangunan tradisional yang dimiliki setiap suku di Indonesia itu merupakan ìhartaî dan jati diri bangsa ini serta berpotensi untuk menginspirasi dunia.

ìJika kita membiarkan kepunahan rumah-rumah adat itu terjadi dan tidak melakukan apa-apa maka saya merasa kita telah melakukan dosa profesi sebagai seorang arsitek,î ujar Yori ketika ditemui Griya Asri di kantornya.

Maka sejak tahun 2008, Yori Antar membuat sebuah gerakan yang ia beri nama Rumah Asuh. Gerakan tersebut mengajak para mahasiswa terpilih untuk belajar dengan para pemangku dan masyarakat desa selama satu setengah bulan dalam membangun rumah-rumah tradisional di pedesaan di tanah air.

Selain sebagai “sarana” belajar bagi mahasiswa dari jurusan arsitektur, program Rumah Asuh yang didukung oleh para donatur/philantropis, akedemis, bersama masyarakat setempat sudah berjalan di daerah Wae Rebo-Flores, beberapa rumah adat di Nias, pembangunan kembali rumah-rumah di desa adat Ratenggaro, Wainyapu, dan Rumah Budaya di Waetabula, Sumba Barat Daya dan Balai Pertemuan untuk Musyawarah Adat Lobo Ngata Toro di Sulawesi Tengah ini juga menjadi sebuah proses pembelajaran dan regenerasi diturunkannya ilmu membangun rumah tradisional kepada generasi masa depan, baik secara metode lisan-tradisional antara para tetua adat dan generasi muda penerus maupun metode tulisan-akademis. Misinya agar kekayaan arsitektur nusantara tetap terjaga kelestarian dan keberlanjutannya dan dari segi pembelajaran masuk ke dalam kurikulum pendidikan arsitektur diberbagai perguruan tinggi sambil membangun mindset baru.